Wrongful Termination: Can an Employee Be Fired for Discussing Wages or Work Conditions With Co-Workers?

What Is Concerted Activity?

Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), employees (including most non-union employees) have the right to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of mutual aid or protection—such as discussing wages or seeking improvements in workplace conditions. However, not all complaints or discussions are protected.

  • Concerted activity means actions taken by or on behalf of a group of employees, or activity that seeks to initiate, induce, or prepare for group action.
  • Activities solely related to personal issues—for example, an employee complaining only about their individualized grievance that does not relate to or seek to involve others—generally are not protected as concerted activity under the NLRA.

In the recent Ninth Circuit case NLRB v. North Mountain Foothills Apartments (2025), the court found that discussing pay and poor working conditions with coworkers, which led to broader concern and affected others, was protected. The employee’s conduct was not just about a personal matter—it was relevant to the group and sparked wider discussion among employees.

NLRB’s Role and the Adjudication Process

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) enforces the NLRA by investigating charges of unfair labor practices, conducting hearings before administrative judges, and issuing decisions and remedies to protect employee rights. The process is administrative, focused on restoring the employee’s prior position (“make-whole relief”) when rights are violated. If the NLRB finds an employer retaliated for protected concerted activity, possible remedies include reinstatement to the employee’s job, back pay and lost benefits, and cleansing of personnel files and orders requiring posting of notice of rights.

As clarified in both the North Mountain decision and by the NLRB in Thryv, Inc., these remedies are equitable—designed to make the employee whole, not to punish the employer. Under present case law, compensatory or punitive damages generally are NOT available, and there is no right to a jury trial in the NLRB process.


Virginia’s Added Protections: Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:9

Virginia law has added a strong parallel protection.  Under Virginia Code § 40.1-28.7:9, it unlawful for employers to discharge or retaliate against employees for inquiring about, discussing, or disclosing their wages or compensation. This law applies regardless of whether there is union involvement. Virginia law also grants employees the right to: file a civil lawsuit in state court and seek remedies including reinstatement, back pay, and “other appropriate relief.”

Takeaway: Employees discussing wages or work conditions for their mutual benefit are protected against employer retaliation under both federal and state law. But purely personal complaints, unrelated to group concerns, may not enjoy such protection. Employers should exercise great caution about disciplining employees for pay or condition-related discussions and seek legal counsel before taking any adverse action.

http://dsgordonlaw.com

https://dsgordonlaw.com/blog.html

Recent Developments in U.S. Employment Law: Top 5 Issues for 2024

As we move through 2024, several key developments in U.S. employment law are poised to impact employers and employees alike. Here are the top five issues shaping the landscape:

  1. Overtime Pay Expansion
    The Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that would increase the salary threshold for overtime pay eligibility. The new rule would raise the threshold to $55,068 annually, making an additional 3.6 million workers eligible for overtime pay. The rule, if implemented, will require employers to adjust their payroll practices to ensure compliance​.
  2. Non-Compete Agreements Under Scrutiny
    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is advancing a rule to ban non-compete agreements. This proposed rule aims to void existing non-compete clauses and prohibit future agreements. The rule has generated significant debate and legal challenges, with final decisions expected later this year. Employers should review their contracts to prepare for potential changes​.
  3. Joint Employer Status
    The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has revised the standard for determining joint employer status. The new rule, effective February 26, 2024, broadens the criteria to include indirect and reserved control over essential employment terms. This change means that businesses could face increased liability for labor practices of their contractors and franchisees​.
  4. Minimum Wage Increases
    Several states and localities have enacted minimum wage increases effective January 1, 2024. Employers need to adjust their payroll systems to comply with these new rates​.
  5. OSHA’s Expanded Reporting Requirements
    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has introduced new reporting requirements for high-hazard industries. Effective January 1, 2024, businesses with 100 or more employees in certain sectors must submit detailed injury and illness records electronically. This rule aims to enhance workplace safety transparency and accountability​.

These developments reflect a broader trend towards greater worker protections and regulatory oversight. Employers should stay informed and proactive in adapting to these changes to ensure compliance and foster a fair and safe working environment.

Court Strikes Down NLRB Joint Employer Rule

On March 8, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) 2023 joint employer rule. The new rule, which was set to take effect on March 11, 2024, expanded the criteria for determining joint employer status, potentially increasing the number of businesses classified as joint employers. The vacated rule would have placed more employers at risk of being deemed joint employers, affecting their liabilities and responsibilities towards employees. Under the proposed 2023 rule, an entity could be deemed a joint employer under common-law agency principles if it had authority to control essential terms and conditions of one’s employment, even if the the control was indirect. The Court found that the new rule failed to provide a clear standard for employers to follow.

The ruling has significant implications for businesses, particularly those who work with contractors or franchisees. The current ruling leaves the 2020 joint employer rule in place, which requires direct and immediate control over employees to establish a joint employer relationship. However, other U.S. District Courts are certain to consider the issue in their jurisdictions, likely resulting in a final review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

NLRB’s New Joint-Employer Rule

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is the federal agency that enforces the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which protects the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively with their employers.

On October 27, 2023, the NLRB published a final rule that changes the standard for determining when two or more entities are joint employers of a group of employees under the NLRA. In the modern workforce, it is not uncommon for an employee to be technically hired by one entity while being contracted to provide services to another business that essentially controls their daily work performance. The new rule provides more clarity and guidance to parties covered by the NLRA regarding their rights and responsibilities when more than one statutory employer possesses the authority to control or exercises the power to control particular employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment.

The new rule implements established common-law standards by considering the an employers’ authority to control essential terms and conditions of employment, whether or not such control is exercised, and without regard to whether any such exercise of control is direct or indirect. Essential terms and conditions of employment include: wages, benefits, and other compensation; hours of work and scheduling; the assignment of duties to be performed; the supervision of the performance of duties; work rules and directions governing the manner, means, and methods of the performance of duties and the grounds for discipline; the tenure of employment, including hiring and discharge; and working conditions related to the safety and health of employees.

The effective date of the rule for new cases is February 26, 2024. For more information, you can read the NLRB’s fact sheet.